Tuesday, September 22, 2009

The IB as an eye-opener

The IB is a great course, which allows you to think rationally, keeping in mind most perspectives. It allows one to explore an idea beyond the limits of the textbook, hence forming his/her own view on the idea. Being part of the IB course was a big eye-opener of sorts for me. I learnt many things that I was earlier ignorant about. Moreover, it allowed me to look at these things in my own way, without any inhibitions.

The one thing I learnt in the IB that will stay with me forever is the way art is viewed, and the way art is studied. Learning about different movements that took place in the history of art is very important, but the IB allows one to interpret these movements, analyse the gradual course of these movements and then work with each movement in a unique manner. The one movement that I could relate to in the history of art is the Pop Art movement.

Pop Art was meant to break all traditional rules of art; it is that movement of art through which everyday objects that are not considered of any artistic value are brought into the art scene, and are glorified by making them into art works. Moreover, pop art was made to appeal to the masses, and the thing that one could identify with the masses was machines. Pop art was 'machine made' and in bulks. It was printed over and over again, like machine-made goods. As expected, pop art originated from advertising.

It was overwhelming for me to learn about pop art, as the concept of glorifying something as trivial as soup cans really struck me. It was hard for me to digest that paintings of recurring soup cans fetched big money. After being exposed to only the traditional art, like still-life, figure drawing and so on, pop art came as a fresh breath of air. One of my favourite artists is Andy Warhol, the father of pop art. A lot of my art works are based on the principles of pop art, as I can relate to it to a great extent. The IB did allow me to find out about this movement in art, which has played a big part in my artworks.

Another thing that I learnt in the IB that will stay with me for a long time to come, is TS Eliot's poetry. If there was one thing that I utterly disliked earlier, it was poetry. Learning Eliot's poetry in IB English provided with a whole new perception to me, as to how one can make poetry interesting. When I studied in the Indian system, we were forced to learn poetry strictly the way the teachers asked us to. There was only one right answer in poetry. English was converted into an objective paper with only right or wrong answers.

TS Eliot wrote about the degradation of the world, and predicted the future of the world, which would be a wasteland. There are layers to his poetry; layers which are open to interpretation. I had no idea that poetry could be so moving, so inspired. Eliot's poetry led me to do a lot of research, it inspired me to make sketches and so on. I was thoroughly moved by his poetry, and I am sure it will remain with me for a long time to come.

In the IB, we are encouraged to think outside the box. We are asked to do a lot of background reading. Moreover, we are expected to make interesting connections between poetry and other areas that seem irrelevant to literature like science, etc.

Talking in broad terms, the IB has helped me question everything I learn. All these questions help me discover the connections between the various areas of knowledge. There are amazing connections that I derived between subjects here at the IB. It feels like more complete education because whatever we learn is questioned and scrutinized endlessly.

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Anybody can make history. Only a great man can write it.

One question that struck me the most in class was, how important is our past? It is important to know our past, mainly because it is the past that brings us to the present, and there are certain events that shape our lives. It is important to know these events, and our own place in these events. More importantly, each individual creates his or her unique spot in the world in the course of his life. This spot is defined more and more through his or her experiences and attitude. This is the spot that he remembers, and all his recollections are based on this. Having no memory of the past cannot lead us to the ultimate truth.

According to me, history is an account (although not complete) of the past. It is merely a story that is altered according to one's convenience. Each version of history is different from another, as experiences in one's life are different from another. This can be seen from diaries of different people. One records those events that make an impact on his/ her life. Those events that are worth remembering, whether bitter or sweet, are the ones that are made immortal in a diary. Everybody makes history through his or her diary. The whole of history is a collection of micro-histories written by individuals. There exists no real macro-history, which generalizes everything that happened in the past.

However, there are few accounts of history that overpower the others, and these are the ones that are written by people in power. There are history textbooks written by publishers who glorify the country, and conveniently leave out the 'villain-ish' tactics that the country has ever undertaken. CBSE history textbooks were completely changed when the ruling party changed from BJP to Congress. Gandhi and Nehru were glorified more in the Indian history. This was part of their propaganda. There will definitely be a great difference between Indian history textbooks and Pakistani history textbooks even if they talk about the same event. Their stance will be different, because of the bitter rivalry between the two countries. It is hence, true that history is written by people in power.

This is a farce, as people in power most generally misuse it. There are fatal conspiracies when it comes to history, and there are many questions left unanswered. The only people who know the truth are the ones in power. Neil Armstrong landing on the moon could be a huge conspiracy! There are theories that propose that he never stepped foot on the moon!